In Texas, Abatement of Lawsuit Not Required Pending Completion of Appraisal Process

In May of 2011, the Supreme Court of Texas acknowledged that appraisal clauses in Texas insurance policies provide a means to resolve disputes about the amount of loss for a covered claim. More importantly, the Court held that mandamus relief is appropriate to enforce an appraisal clause because denying the appraisal would vitiate the insurer's right to defend its breach of contract claim. In even stronger language, the Court noted that "[t]his [appraisal] could short-circuit potential litigation and should be pursued before resorting to the courts."

Although the Court recognized the validity of the appraisal clause as a contractually agreed process to potentially resolve all contractual disputes between the insurer and the policyholder, the Court held that "the trial court's failure to grant the motion to abate is not subject to mandamus, and the proceedings need not be abated while the appraisal goes forward." As a basis for its decision that abatement is not required, the Court relied on the language of its prior 2002 opinion where the Court noted that the trial court has "some discretion as to the timing of the appraisal."

The question remains: why does the trial court's have discretion whether to abate a case until the appraisal process is completed? In 2009, the Supreme Court noted that "appraisals generally resolve such disputes" and that "the results [of appraisals] can be challenged later if the insureds were dissatisfied." I have not identified any case where the Court explains in any real detail its reasoning that abatement is not required while the appraisal process is ongoing. From the cases I have reviewed, it appears that only basis for this conclusion comes from the Court's 2002 statement that the trial court has "some discretion as to the timing of the appraisal."

Based on the Supreme Court's most recent comments on the validity of the appraisal, does the trial court really have discretion on the timing of appraisal, once invoked? I am uncertain whether it logically follows that the trial court has discretion on the timing of appraisal when appraisal clauses must be enforced, and appraisal is a condition precedent to filing suit. It also seems to be an illogical leap for the Court to determine that appraisal may resolve all contractual issues made the basis of the suit while at the same time ordering costly discovery to proceed on claims that may be mooted by the outcome of the appraisal process.

http://www.jonathanallenlaw.com/.
Jonathan C. Allen

Over the years, I have represented a variety of businesses, ranging from the commercial contractor to the large petrochemical plant, in the resolution of insurance coverage and commercial disputes, as well as construction defect claims and general liability suits brought by contractors and employees. At my website, I write a business litigation blog, complete with movie and television references, and I also write an insurance coverage blog. I invite you to read my blogs and comment on any posts that interest you.

View the original article here

Hiring A Divorce Attorney - 3 Factors That Matter

It is an unfortunate aspect of hiring a divorce attorney that most people in a position to do so are not in a great frame of mind to do it right. The dissolution of a marriage is often a sudden, highly traumatic event and this isn't conducive to making a good decision. By the same token, this is one of the primary reasons why you need to hire one. The worst thing you can do is attempt to navigate your way through a complex, legal minefield with neither the knowledge nor the mindset to do so successfully. If you can compose yourself and find temporary balance, here are three factors that matter when hiring a lawyer.

Experience

This is an easy one, because it requires no evaluation on your part. A divorce attorney either has experience or he doesn't. He should have at least five years in the bag before you consider hiring him. This shouldn't be five years of general law experience, either. Four years of working with wills and trusts and one year of handling divorce is not what you're looking for. Not only do you want to find someone with relevant experience, but it also doesn't hurt if most of that experience is local in nature. Having a lawyer who knows the judges, the way the courts work in your area, and some of the tricks that might work to your advantage can come in handy.

Testimonials

A good divorce attorney should have plenty of past clients willing to go on the record for them. In a best-case scenario, you'll find your lawyer through someone you know. This is an instant referral and testimonial wrapped into one, and it comes in the form of someone you can trust. This is more valuable than the biggest and best advertisements in the city. If you found a lawyer through other means, however, you should ask them for client testimonials. No, this doesn't mean a couple of highlighted paragraphs on a website. You should be able to speak with his or her clients and hear what they have to say.

Communication

Every divorce attorney should be a good communicator. After all, in a field that depends on negotiation and bargaining, you need someone who can talk a good game. But they should also be adept at communicating with their own clients. You can evaluate this for yourself in an initial consultation. Often provided for free by law offices looking for business, this meeting gives you a chance to feel out a lawyer. Talk to him or her. See if you actually get along. This is more important than you might think.

When in the market for an Albuquerque divorce attorney, locals should trust the poise and experience of the staff at http://www.sutherlandfamilylaw.com/.

View the original article here

Builder Warranty Insurance: A Riddle Wrapped Within a Mystery Within an Enigma?

There is a wealth of uncertainty in the community, seemingly amongst builders and owners alike, as to the extent of coverage of warranty insurance for domestic (or residential) builders.

As most of you know, a registered domestic builder is required to carry warranty insurance for all building contracts worth more than $12,000 in value. In order to maintain their registration as domestic builders from year to year, they must be eligible for warranty insurance.

It is mandated by the Building Act 1993 that domestic builders must carry this insurance, but despite the common misapprehension amongst many in the builder fraternity, the insurance exists to protect owners (in limited circumstances) and should not be seen as some back stop or 'life preserver' for builders. This is despite the fact the builder pays the premiums.

The extent of coverage depends on the relevant Ministerial Order that applies to the policy, depending on the time the building contract was entered into. Prior to July 2002, under the old Ministerial Orders the insurance policies had to provide owners with up to $100,000 per dwelling, in coverage for defective building works (ie in breach of the section 8 warranties) and incomplete works.

Often times under the old insurance regime much effort and emphasis would be placed on the Insurer forcing the original Builder to return to site to rectify their defects at their own cost. This is obviously more economic than having another contractor working over the top of the original Builder's work at a risk mark up.

Since July 2002 under the new insurance regime and subsequent Ministerial Orders, the Insurers must provide coverage of up to $200,000 per dwelling. The major catch though is that under the newer regime the Builder has to have died, disappeared or become insolvent before an insurance claim may be made.

The cap of $200,000 includes coverage for defective works (ie works not in accordance with the building contract or in breach of the section 8 warranties) and for incomplete works. Coverage for incomplete works is capped at 20% of the adjusted Contract Price (ie adjusted for any variations during the works).
In addition the $200,000 cap can include coverage for some alternative accommodation, relocation/storage and legal/consultant fees ("incidentals") within that overall figure.

Generally speaking, the Policy of insurance must cover owners for non-completion of the works or breach of statutory warranty (ie defects) because of death, disappearance or insolvency of the Builder.

Owners should be wary of the definition of "developer" within the terms of an insurance policy. The current Ministerial Guidelines allow an Insurer to prevent Owners who are regarded as "developers" from claiming for completion costs. So any such Owners would be able to claim for defect rectification costs only, as well as any 'incidentals' that can be claimed within the $200,000 cap.

The definition of "developer" in the Vero policy is someone for whom 3 or more homes are built on one building site (or more than one building site) under one domestic building contract.

A typical Policy must now cover Owners for non-structural defects for a period of up to 2 years following the completion of the work or the date of termination of the building contract, whichever is earlier. For structural defects, coverage must ensue for a period of 6 years from completion of the work or the date of termination of the building contract, whichever is earlier.

At recent builder seminars the writer has attended, this has been a source of great confusion and some angst for some of the builders present, particularly when it is mentioned that a builder can be liable to an owner in a potential 'building action' for 10 years after completion (ie the issue of the Certificate of Occupancy or the Certificate of Final Inspection).

The confusion has been that insurance coverage for structural defects only lasts for 6 years, leaving a 'black hole' of another 4 years where there is no insurance coverage. Of course, most defects will have already materialised in the first 6 years, but for the remaining 4 years in the 10 year liability cap it is still possible for an owner to sue a builder for damages for defective building work.

Owners need to be wary of not getting caught out for not making a claim in a timely way. An Owner must notify the Insurer of the death, disappearance or insolvency of the Builder within the required time.

In the current Vero policy it is 180 days of becoming aware of the event or happening or when the Owner might reasonably have been expected to become aware of that event or happening.

In addition, such Policies will often include a caveat that Owners must not limit or exclude their rights against a party against whom they might otherwise be able to recover, ie the Builder. This can sometimes make Owners wary of terminating their building contracts against a builder who has gone 'AWOL' and appears to be on the cusp of becoming insolvent.

However, it appears that Insurers will not prevent an owner from claiming on their indemnity just because they have terminated for just cause against a Builder. It will not necessarily prevent the Insurer from claiming against the Builder in any event, given the guarantees that directors of building companies must give to Insurers when they take out the Policy.

View the original article here

Are Lawyers Really Smarter? A Research Study Proves It

Over the years, people have told me that lawyers are very smart. However, after being in business for quite a while I would say that while there are some very smart lawyers, and I would say somewhere in the neighborhood of 10 to 20% are, but not necessarily the rest. You see, there are a whole lot of lawyers and attorneys who are out there faking it so they can charge you more money. Not to mention the fact that it's often paralegals and other folks in the office that are doing most of the work. Of course, rather than get on my high horse or go into some lawyer jokes, I'd like to talk to you about some research on this topic.

There was an interesting article in the Wall Street Journal on August 28, 2012 titled; "Study Shows Why Lawyers Are So Smart" by Sam Favate, which appeared in the Law Blog section, and I have no doubt that a group of lawyers were behind this study. The article noted that even those who merely study for the LSAT for 3-months or 100-hours achieve better results on specific parts of the IQ test. An MIT professor of neuroscience believes that the study isn't so surprising as anytime the brain learns something new or foreign it creates new pathways, which is about what the researchers had reasoned because it seemed increase cross-brain communication.

Fine, no problem, and even though I have little use for lawyers and do not consider them smarter, I also realize that since they live and work in a fake made-up world, different from reality, they are working or learning in a totally new environment. Almost as if we threw you into a third world nation, in a village with different customs and a different language, you'd have to learn your way of getting along, and you'd develop different pathways as well.

Now then, I would submit to you that computer programmers also become smart and create new cross-brain communication pathways as they are diving into a whole new world. The same with mathematics or music, it appears to be a totally different realm. Those that do lots of traveling, or even taxicab drivers in New York as they learn the ins and outs of getting around town have been shown to also increase their intelligence levels and create new brain pathways.

Therefore, in conclusion I'd say that anyone that has to use their brain for something which is fairly foreign to them and a whole new way of thinking, it will increase their intelligence level to some degree. If we say that makes them smarter, then so be it. In that case lawyers are smarter to some extent. Indeed I hope you will please consider all this and think on it. If you are a lawyer, I willing to debate you on this topic at an intellectual level, but in this realm, I rule, and you can't twist the law of nature in your favor. It is what it is.

Lance Winslow has launched a new provocative series of eBooks on Mind and Memory. Lance Winslow is a retired Founder of a Nationwide Franchise Chain, and now runs the Online Think Tank; http://www.worldthinktank.net/

View the original article here

Bankruptcy And Bounced Checks

Many financial problems arise for people who have found themselves considering bankruptcy. A couple of checks that have bounced just prior to filing could very well be part of the problem.

Will bankruptcy take care of bounced checks? For the most part, yes.

This is really important because for people who have bounced checks, they can often face some of the most egregious threats on the part of creditors. Criminal charges are often threatened for very small amounts, which can be very intimidating for a person already in enough trouble to consider bankruptcy.

Do not let the threats from creditors claiming you will be charged with a crime bother you. They resort to such threats because they know they probably have no chance of ever collecting after bankruptcy.

A check that bounces will not be discharged only if the creditor can prove fraud, false pretenses or material misrepresentation and does so in bankruptcy court. The creditor will have to pursue a judicial ruling from the bankruptcy court demonstrating all the elements of common law fraud.

First, the creditor must show the debtor obtained money, property, services or credit. Using this standard, if you write a check that was intended to pay a debt, like a credit card, and that check bounces, then this element is not met.

This is because you did not receive money, property, services or credit. This bounced check will be discharged. If you write a check and receive legal services or some other product, then the creditor will have met its burden on this element.

Secondly, the creditor must show that the bad check was written along with intentionally and materially false statements made by the debtor. This is very difficult because so many checks are written without any accompanying statements at all.

If you are in line at the grocery store writing a check you know is bad and say "I swear I will have money in the bank to cover this check", the creditor will still not meet its burden. It will have to show that you intended to mislead the creditor through this statement.

Perhaps a creditor would be able to show a false statement if it was made over the phone and the creditor recorded it. Otherwise, a creditor will most likely fail to meet this element.

A creditor would next be required to show that the debtor knew the check would bounce when they wrote it and intended that it not be paid. Many people write checks with insufficient funds in their account the moment they write the check, but intend to replenish their account in time to pay for the check.

If this is the case, then the creditor will not be able to stop this debt from being discharged because the debtor did not have the requisite intent at the time of the check.

The high burden for creditors to prove fraud is why so many of them decide not to challenge these debts in bankruptcy. It makes no sense for them to fight so diligently to recover what is almost certainly a nominal sum.

But if the creditor makes it this far, they still have another hurdle to overcome. An additional requirement is that the creditor must show that statements that were made by the debtor were relied upon by the creditor. This reliance needs to be justifiable.

If someone promised they would pay you by writing a check that was post-dated. If a creditor writes his own check that depends upon the debtor's check clearing, then the creditor has relied upon the statements of the debtor.

Again, however, the reliance needs to be justifiable so if the statements made by the debtor were during a time of obvious inebriation, the creditor would fail to meet its burden.

If you are being contacted by a third-party debt collection agency demanding payment on a bad check, it is almost certain that they did not justifiably rely upon any statements made by the debtor when the check was written.

Most checks that bounced prior to bankruptcy are discharged in bankruptcy. The burden is on the creditor to prove each element of fraud in order to prevail. These requirements make it very likely a creditor will not sue on a bad check unless it is for a very high amount that makes the legal costs worth it.

Don't expect that they won't resort to harassment and threats and other ways to get you to pay up. Creditors often continue to harass, threaten and intimidate debtors even after bankruptcy has been filed. Don't be afraid. Most people who are in bankruptcy are not the type of people their creditors believe they are.

Seabrook Law Group helps people claim a better future through bankruptcy. We are a law firm in Seattle working to assist those who need to the protection afforded by Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 Banruptcy.

Feel free to visit your Seattle Bankruptcy Attorney online. Or Call us at 206.274.6219.

View the original article here

Hiring a Divorce Lawyer You Can Afford!

Money is tight but you need to get a divorce. Finding a divorce lawyer that will fit with your budget is important to you. Doing an online search will yield hundreds of attorneys that are cheap and quick. Unfortunately many of these attorneys prey on unsuspecting individuals who feel desperate and have next to no experience in choosing a legal professional.

What is good to know is that there are attorneys out there that are legitimate, experienced and well qualified. You will be able to find a lawyer who will be able to successfully complete your divorce at a cost that will suit your budget. Before you can find such a divorce lawyer though you need to become more educated about what to look for in this regard.

You may be tempted to sign with the first budget friendly attorney that you come across because the price is suitable for your needs. There are plenty of law firms that would be willing to take on your case at a low cost because they represent a large pool of clients at once. The down side to this is that these firms tend to be overwhelmed by their caseload and disorganized as a result of taking on too much. This does not bode well for you because it means that you will have to sacrifice quality for cost. Your case will probably not get the attention and the time that it requires.

Before you sign with any divorce lawyer always investigate the law firm on your own. You must be thorough and precise when it comes to this. Ask for references for the legal professional and/or check the firm's standing with the local bar association. If the law firm has been charged with any professional violations then this is something that you want to know about before you sign with them.

In looking for a divorce lawyer that you can afford, hire one whose office is to be found as close to your home or your workplace as possible. This will decrease your travelling expenses as well as the billable hours for your file. If it is possible for you to do so, deliver your divorce papers to the attorney's office in person. This will reduce or completely eliminate any extra charges that you would otherwise have to pay for courier services. The easier you can make things for your divorce lawyer, the less money you will have to pay.

Ask the divorce specialist for a complete fee schedule and for the terms of the contract up front. You want the terms of the contract to be as specific as possible. You want to know how the firm defines billable hours and you also want to know how much you will be charged per photocopy. It is also a good idea to find out the estimate for the number of hours for each task that will be billed.

View the original article here

Why Is Hiring A DUI Lawyer A Good Idea For Your Case?

If you have been pulled over and accused of drinking and driving, you might assume you have to face the consequences, especially if you were clearly inebriated. However, there is still a chance you can get out of the charges, which is why hiring a DUI lawyer is so important. Find out why you should hire an attorney if you want the best possible outcome for your case.

Even if you actually had a few drinks before driving, it is possible that the equipment used to measure your blood alcohol content was defective. Unless you know your blood alcohol content before getting behind the wheel, you have no idea how accurate it was. The Breathalyzer may not have been calibrated or maintained correctly, which could have a big effect on your case. Even .01 could be the difference between you getting charged and being left alone by the police, such as if your blood alcohol content was measured at .08 but was actually .07. This is why it is worth it to get a DUI lawyer to make sure the equipment is correct.

It is also possible that the evidence was tampered with or even mixed up. This is especially possible if you took a blood test that claims you were drunk, but you know you had very little, or nothing at all, to drink. You never know what goes on in the lab where the test results are kept. A tired or lazy employee could have mixed up or mislabeled your results. In fact, it is possible that the officer, or someone else who wants to see you in trouble, purposely changed the results. If this is the case, your DUI lawyer will likely be able to detect the evidence and get the case thrown out.

If it turns out you were drinking and driving and simply had no excuse for it, your attorney still might be able to help. If you do not hire a DUI lawyer, you face the maximum penalties, which can be quite harsh. However, if you have someone standing up for you and negotiating, you might get minimal penalties. This is especially the case if your record is clean or there were extenuating circumstances surrounding your arrest.

Clearly, it is worth it to hire a DUI lawyer. There is a surprising number of people who are able to get out of this charge because of the details in their situation that only an attorney will notice. If you want this same outcome, you should talk to a local legal professional.

Looking for the right DUI lawyer San Jose for you? Contact http://www.summitdefense.com/ because this charge shouldn't be the end of your world.

View the original article here

Finding A Foreclosure Service For Yourself

No one wants to think about having their home foreclosed on. Perhaps you have been struggling to pay on a loan, and you are beginning to think your lender may choose to begin the process. If you think this is a possibility, you will want to go through a foreclosure service to see if they will be able to help you to keep this from happening.

When the economy is struggling, individuals struggle too. Whether you purchased a house and then lost your job, started building a home and had to stop because of lack of resources, or had owned a home for a number of years and are beginning to get behind on payments, it is important in each circumstance to go through the right channels to get the help you need.

Before choosing a foreclosure service, make sure that the firm is a reputable one. Anyone can make promises, but do some research to see if the firm you choose has kept those promises. They should have a good record of getting people out of tight spots when it comes to having their home foreclosed on. Also look at the individual law professionals who are represented at the firm. If you go to the website for the firm, it should give biographies on the individual lawyers so that you can see their past education and experience.

The cost of hiring a foreclosure service should be such that you do not need to worry about going into more debt. You are obviously in enough trouble with your home if you need to call them, so they should definitely have a way for you to pay them back that will be easy for you to deal with.

An important attribute of a foreclosure service is each lawyers ability to work with people. He or she should make you their priority. They may have other cases they are working on, but while they are with you, it is important for them to focus on what you need for your situation.

Confidentiality is essential for a lawyer. You need to know that you can trust your lawyer with any information that you give him or her. This is something that must be a guarantee before hiring anyone to help you out of a financial bind.

When it comes to the finances that you are struggling with, also choose a foreclosure service that has financial counselors who will be able to get you back on the right track with your finances. With their help, hopefully you will not have to contact the firm again in the future.

Finding a Lake Mary FL foreclosure service to help you save your home is not always easy. For trusted professionals with experience in the field, contact http://www.fightforeclosurecases.com/.

View the original article here

Attorney: Importance

Attorney means Lawyer. You always wonder why a particular attorney is often quoted on a news item, you may also wonder why press men and newspaper publications do not give you a call despite handling several successful cases, and even when a reporter calls you, how do you know the proper ways of answering his calls and giving him or her the right fact. It is ideal for a law firm to understand how effective it could be to deal with the press and make them your friends to use them for your law firm marketing strategies.

It is not enough to be a successful lawyer by the number of cases you have handled, you must be known through the media, and the media can get your message widely distributed than what you individual achievements can do and they do this through credible news items. The key for a law firm to become successful through the press is to become a good source of information for the reporters. One of the opportunities for being a news source for the press is that your law firm and attorneys name will become much more pronounced and potential clients will be generated from such.

Since a reporter will like to protect his valued source, he will try as much as possible to enhance your credibility also. Unresponsive lawyers are often ignored by press men and that is not good for the image of such attorneys and their law firms. When you respond adequately to a legal issue, your source for information will be trusted and the reporter will always want to work with you in the future.

Most press men and reporters are inquisitive and bright in nature with some of them having law degrees and are full journalist. They are highly trained individuals who can be thrown into an unfamiliar situations and then start to search for information. With this in mind a law firm should understand that it is dealing with highly intelligent professionals who will not take chances with their jobs. The best possible ways by which a law firm can make reporters their friends is by getting active on issues which are widely reported by local and international media and ensure that such relationships are sustained.

Use of an Attorney:

Get the property you pay for:

Accurate land records are critical to sound real estate transaction. Each property must be searched by tracing the names of past owners and comparing the legal descriptions of the property.

Verifying these land records is challenging and exciting. Licensed attorneys, with their specialized knowledge and experience, are best equipped to verify key facts. Provide information necessary to obtain title insurance, and advise you of any circumstances that might affect your purchase.

Make your best deal:

Unexpected issues often arise at the time of closing, and they must be resolved through negotiation. In the Northeast, the seller is a real estate transaction typically is represented by an attorney at closing.

Avoid legal pitfalls

Lead paint, environmental pollution, buried oil tanks; encroachments; land use restrictions and zoning issues are just a few of the potential pitfalls in any closing. Buyers and sellers alike need competent, independent legal counsel to overcome them successfully.

Take advantage of proven expertise

A custom becomes a tradition when it's widely recognized as the most effective way to get something done. That's how attorneys came to be the principal providers of closing services in the first place and why buyers, sellers smart and lenders continue to engage them.

View the original article here

Texas Adopts Anti-Indemnity Statute Applicable to Construction Contracts

After years of failed attempts, the Texas Legislature was finally successful in passing an Anti-Indemnity Statute applicable to the construction industry. Chapter 151 of the Texas Insurance Code addresses not only addresses the appropriate use of indemnification clauses in construction contracts, but it also tackles additional insured provisions. Section 151.101 applies broadly to any construction contract where one party is required to provide liability insurance coverage. In addition, so that it capture as many contractual agreements as possible, construction contract is defined very broadly.

Section 151.001(5) defines "construction contract" as "a contract, subcontract, or agreement, or a performance bond assuring the performance of any of the foregoing, entered into or made by an owner, architect, engineer, contractor, construction manager, subcontractor, supplier, or material or equipment lessor for the design, construction, alteration, renovation, remodeling, repair, or maintenance of, or for the furnishing of material or equipment for, a building, structure, appurtenance, or other improvement to or on public or private real property, including moving, demolition, and excavation connected with the real property. The term includes an agreement to which an architect, engineer, or contractor and an owner's lender are parties regarding an assignment of the construction contract or other modifications thereto."

The statute makes "void and unenforceable as against public policy" any provision in a construction contract that requires an indemnitor to indemnify an indemnitee for the indemnitee's negligence. The only indemnification provision that is now permitted is one where the indemnitor agrees to indemnify the indemnitee for the portion of the damages that can be attributed to the indemnitor's conduct. Despite the broad application of the statute to all construction contracts, there is one important exception. It does not apply to an indemnification agreement where the indemnitor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless another party for the bodily injury or death of the indemnitor's employee, agent, or subcontractor.

The Anti-Indemnity Statute also cuts off the back door avenue to obtain full indemnification for one own's negligence - -the additional insured clause. The statute still allows construction contracts to require the purchase of additional insured coverage. However, if the coverage provides coverage that is otherwise prohibited in the indemnification clause in the contract, it too is void and unenforceable.

The effective date of the statute is January 1, 2012. If you are a business that is relying on those old contract forms and insurance policies for protection against the company's own negligence, then you need to reevaluate the company's potential exposure.

http://www.jonathanallenlaw.com/.
Jonathan C. Allen

Over the years, I have represented a variety of businesses, ranging from the commercial contractor to the large petrochemical plant, in the resolution of insurance coverage and commercial disputes, as well as construction defect claims and general liability suits brought by contractors and employees. At my website, I write a business litigation blog, complete with movie and television references, and I also write an insurance coverage blog. I invite you to read my blogs and comment on any posts that interest you.

View the original article here

How A Molestation Lawyer Works For The Best Outcome

There is a reason why attorneys have to go through so much extensive training and schooling in order to practice in the field. This is so they can offer the very best defense for people in need. Think of it as a service career. Justice should be available for each and every person, and a good attorney will go to great lengths to see the success of his or her clients. This is also true of a molestation lawyer. The right representative will carefully assess the situation and shine light on points that may not have been considered. This way everyone involved will have a fair trial. The client is bound to see success after choosing the right attorney.

Sexual abuse and assault have certainly become common in this world. It's plain and simple that these acts are wrong, but it's an issue that goes on every day. Though every person cannot possibly be protected from these acts ahead of time, there is always help available when it comes to making people pay for their wrongs. Hiring an attorney is pretty easy, as there are so many that offer a variety of services nowadays. A molestation lawyer can help all those who have been accused of abusing another individual.

Once accused of this type of sexual crime, the blamed person should contact a legal representative right away. From that point on, a molestation lawyer can explain the legal process to the client and carefully listen to his or her side of the story. The representative will then bring in experts to help more deeply investigate the situation. Witnesses will also be sought. The strength of this team will determine the outcome of the case. Choosing a representative with years of experience and positive results is the best thing to do.

A molestation lawyer can definitely help a person to avoid jail time and other unsavory results. After being arrested, it is important that the client work hard to cooperate with the attorney. The client should always attend the court dates. Refusal to do so can certainly result in more terrible consequences. A legal representative will have lots of difficulty if the client is not available at the required times. The attorney's job is to work hard and construct the perfect strategy for the client. This task will be impossible without the help, participation, and cooperation of the client him or herself.

Being charged with a sexual crime can be an embarrassing, life-changing experience. There is ridicule that follows, to say nothing of the possibility of spending years behind bars. This can be devastating. However, being charged does not have to mean the end of the world. There is help available. And believe it or not, the results can be positive. The key is hiring the right legal representatives. In some situations, people need extra help in defending and speaking for themselves. A professional will do this in a manner that will prove the truth and deliver justice. A molestation lawyer can indeed provide these services.

For the San Jose molestation lawyer residents can trust to protect their reputations and deliver real results, visit http://www.sexcrimelawfirm.com/ the moment any accusations arise.

View the original article here

How To Get A Marriage License

With its focus on family, friends, food, flowers and the future, a wedding day is a wonderfully romantic celebration for a couple. Yet, there is also crucial paperwork to be attended to even at such an emotional, monumental time of life. In order for a wedded union in any state to be legally recognized, a marriage license is required. Marriage licenses can be obtained from state government offices or courthouses, but only when certain criteria, that differ between the states, are followed.

Waiting Periods And Blood Test Requirements For Getting A Marriage License

Although all states issue marriage licenses under the law, laws such as those that relate to the waiting period for issuing the license after an application is made vary from state to state. Currently, Wisconsin has a six day waiting period, while New York, South Carolina and Illinois have only one day. The majority of states do not have any waiting period, while many require a wait of three days. Iowa, Maine, New Jersey and Washington are some of the states that have a three day waiting period. The main reason for requiring a wait between applying for and receiving the marriage license is to allow a change of mind to help avoid a pressure-filled environment surrounding a wedding.

To get a marriage license, some states still require blood tests. This is done to try to help prevent the spread of diseases that are especially harmful to fetuses such as German measles and sickle cell anemia. Testing for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) is not mandatory in any state, but is often recommended in many states for a couple applying for a marriage license. At the time of this writing, blood tests before marriage are still required in Alabama, the District of Columbia, Idaho, Virginia, Montana and Oklahoma as well as some others.

The Age Of Consent And Legal Proof For The Termination Of Past Marriages

The state office should always be contacted about any requirements needed before getting a marriage license in that state as the stipulations may change at any time. Common requirements for getting marriage licenses include reaching the age of consent in a particular state, which for most states is 18, or having a parents' permission if a person is under age. One or two witnesses to the marriage ceremony is also mandatory in many states.

Legal proof of divorce or spousal death is needed for any previous marriages if either individual applying for a marriage license has been married before. Online marriage records, searched through a professional government vital record provider, can be a quick and convenient way to access a certified copy of a marriage certificate to provide this proof.

Certified Versus Informational Copies Of Online Marriage Records

Certified copies of vital records such as divorce or death certificates are printed on official paper and are considered legal documents. Informational copies, on the other hand, are typically marked as such and are not admissible as proof of either a death or a divorce. In all states, the parties named on the document may access the record, and the same goes for accessing online marriage records. In closed record states, marriage documents are not accessible by the general public. Legal representatives and immediate family members are usually able to obtain certified copies of vital records even in closed record states.

Find Marriage License information for all states online at your convenience at a trusted web archive. Also locate Online Marriage Records officially and accurately through an Internet database, accurate search system.

View the original article here

Another Wound to Bad Faith Litigation in Texas: The 2012 Version

In a 5-4 decision, the Texas Supreme Court held that employees that are injured on the job are not permitted to assert bad faith claims against workers' compensation carriers under the Texas Insurance Code. However, without providing any examples, the Court held that bad faith claims can be asserted by injured employees for policy misrepresentations.

The underlying case involved an employee who claimed that he was injured on the job After the employee filed his worker's compensation claim, his employer informed The insurance company that that the employee was actually injured in a softball game. The claim was denied on that basis, but eventually, the insurer relented and settled the coverage claim made by The employee. However, by that time, the employee argued that the damage had already been done, and he sued the insurer on the grounds that the company had engaged in bad faith by believing his employer instead of him. More specifically, he alleged that the insurance company committed the following acts of bad faith:

1. Failed to adopt and implement reasonable standards for promptly investigating claims;

2. Refused to pay Ruttiger's claim without having conducted a reasonable investigation;

3. Failed to promptly provide a reasonable explanation for denying his claim;

4. Failed to attempt to promptly and fairly settle the claim when liability was reasonably clear; and

5. Misrepresented the insurance policy to him.

After the trial concluded, the employee was successful, and he was awarded compensation in excess of the amount provided by the insurer in connection with the previously executed compromise and settlement agreement. On appeal, the trial court's award was confirmed by the Houston Court of Appeals. The insurer appealed once again to the Supreme Court of Texas.

The Supreme Court reversed the trial court's decision and held that the employee could not succeed on either his causes of action for bad faith pursuant to the Texas Insurance Code or his DTPA causes of action pursuant to the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act claims. The Court held that bad faith claims brought by aggrieved workers were inconsistent with the comprehensive statutory worker's compensation scheme created by the Texas Legislature, and that the injured employee's dispute of the initial denial of his claim resulted in a resolution of his worker's compensation claim just as the statute was designed to function.

I have previously written extensively regarding the Supreme Court's rulings concerning the appraisal clauses found in most insurance policies and the potential erosion of the viability of many bad faith claims as a result of those holdings. The 2012 opinion is a further erosion of bad faith claim viability. If the Texas Legislature were to later mandate an administrative dispute resolution process for non-worker's compensation first party disputes, would such a mandate be sufficient for the Supreme Court of Texas to find that such an ADR process obviates the need for bad faith claims? Based on the Court's reasoning, that would certainly be a legitimate conclusion.

http://www.jonathanallenlaw.com/.
Jonathan C. Allen

Over the years, I have represented a variety of businesses, ranging from the commercial contractor to the large petrochemical plant, in the resolution of insurance coverage and commercial disputes, as well as construction defect claims and general liability suits brought by contractors and employees. At my website, I write a business litigation blog, complete with movie and television references, and I also write an insurance coverage blog. I invite you to read my blogs and comment on any posts that interest you.

View the original article here

Discussing Options With A Foreclosure Attorney

Hiring a foreclosure attorney could be one of the best steps you take. This process is one that entails various steps. Many of them occur behind the scenes where attorneys work to push the courts into foreclosing on a property as the result of non-payment of debts owed. Yet, for those who wish to keep their home, there are options available. It is a good idea to have a lawyer by your side as this can help to minimize the risks you have of not getting the type of outcome right for you. Sometimes, you just want to know your options too.

Stalling the Proceedings

One of the reasons to hire a foreclosure attorney is to help stall the courts from going through with foreclosing on your home or other real estate. Many homeowners just need more time to get the funds together to keep their home out of this situation. It is not easy, but it is an option in some cases. Below are some of the options attorneys can help you with in delaying or overcoming this legal process?

Short Sales and Selling the Home

One option for some individuals is to sell their home. This option protects the homeowner's credit and any investment into the property. If the homeowner cannot find a buyer at full price, a short sale process may be an option. This allows the property owner to sell the home for less than what is owed. The lender must agree to this, which is why it is important to have legal guidance on your side.

Modification

For those who wish to remain in their home, it may be an option to modify the loan. Lenders do not have to do this. Even if government programs request that they do, there is no law that says they have to. However, a lawyer can help to provide help in encouraging the lender to modify the loan so that the debt is caught up.

Contesting Proceedings

As mentioned, the foreclosure process is one that entails various legal proceedings. With the aid of a lawyer, you can contest various steps in the proceedings. Were you given fair and accurate notice of the intent to foreclose? Was the lender in violation of another legal requirement? Your lawyer can help you to fight the proceedings based on these types of missteps.

Ultimately, a foreclosure attorney can help to protect your right in a home. Individuals may wish simply to talk about their options with a legal professional to find out what can be done. There is no guarantee of a solution, but in many cases, there is help available to help you to get through the process with the best possible outcome.

Having a San Francisco foreclosure attorney on your side is key to shouldering the load of foreclosure. You don't have to face foreclosure alone when you contact http://www.morilaw.com/.

View the original article here

5 Ways To Choose a Family Law Attorney

Have you discovered there are times in life when you need the help of a good family law attorney? If not, it probably won't be long before you do. When that time comes, you may wonder how you'll ever intelligently choose the best one.

Difficult times make choices more challenging, but it's possible to find the right family law attorney even under the hardest circumstances. Here are a few important considerations, which may help you decide.

Experience

Find someone whose legal specialty is family law. The more experience someone has in a specific field, the more expertise they'll have in processing related cases.

Communication

Is the door of communication open either via E-mail or telephone? Do they answer questions in a timely manner? Are questions answered completely and in a timely manner?

Courtroom Experience

Don't be afraid to ask how much courtroom experience they've had. Getting the most compensation requires a courageous and hard working lawyer. These two qualities are necessary if they need to do battle with a judge and jury.

Compatibility

How well do you work together? Are they sincerely interested in your case? Do they listen and do you feel comfortable with them not just as a family law attorney but as a person?

Credentials

Good credentials are essential. You'll want to find out if they're in good standing in their community and among their peers. Check to see if they have any malpractice cases against them by calling your local bar association.

It's important to know what fees will be charged. There can be secretarial and paralegal time fees, filing fees, the lawyer's fee and other additional fees. Make sure they're all specifically noted on your agreement.

Once you feel comfortable with your decision about who your family law attorney will be, the next thing to do is meet to discuss your case. At this meeting, you'll need to be prepared to honestly discuss the specifics of your case in detail. This is the time for you to be as honest as possible. A successful outcome may depend on your truthfulness.

Divorce is often a situation, which needs the attention of a family law attorney. Child custody and support, for instance, are often difficult areas, which require experience and care in handling. This lawyer will have the expertise needed according to the laws of your state. They can advise you on what to expect. If your ex-spouse has not lived up to his or her child financial agreement, a lawyer can once again step in to help.

Many cases are often drug out in court for long periods of time. Making the best choice is crucial if you're going to avoid lengthy court time.

The right kind of lawyer will help you quickly get back on the road to success. Stressful circumstances are indeed challenging but the assistance of the right lawyer will help make the pathway to peace of mind smoother for all.

View the original article here

Top 3 Benefits of Hiring the Services of Lawyers

Lawyers are among the most respected professionals in the past up to this very day and that fact is most likely to remain the same in the future. Almost all of our daily activities revolve around different types of laws as well as almost all the things that happen to us. It would be very difficult to think of one thing that does not involve a certain law. For this reason alone, we all realize that the services provided by lawyers all over the globe are really very important. Aside from being important, there are also a lot of benefits provided by their services and here are the top 3:

Convenience - Almost all, if not all, of us would agree that doing legal paperwork is tedious. It is almost unimaginable for an average person to process correct legal paperwork without the help of a professional. Hiring the services of a lawyer would solve this dilemma. Our legal concerns could be taken care of conveniently as there would be someone who is capable of handling it for us if we have our own attorney.

Source of Valuable Information - Anyone could definitely gain valuable information from a professional lawyer. They can give us great advice in so many things that we do since, as mentioned earlier, almost all that we do is covered by a certain law. We are sure to learn a lot of important details that we are most likely not to know if we do not hire the services of one. We could do a lot more things if we are equipped with the right knowledge about how various things work and lawyers are just the right persons who could provide us with it.

Justice - It would be hard to find justice without lawyers. Without them, we would not know if liability falls to this or that party. A simple dog bite injury caused by the negligence of one person could even be a difficult situation to settle if we do not hire the services of lawyers. We must all understand that injustice is prevalent but we sure can do something to prevent or address it accordingly. Hiring the services of an attorney would help each one of us get what is due for us if we need help. Not all things could be settled amicably these days which is why people have an option to settle various cases in court and what a better way to win our case other than hiring a lawyer.

These are only 3 of the many benefits one can get in hiring a lawyer. There are several instances wherein hiring their services is a must. With that said, we all need to look for a good attorney to help us any time since we really could not predict when we would need their assistance. We can visit several law firms and ask for advice or we can also get recommendations from people we know. Finding the right one is not that difficult since there are now a lot of good lawyers located in various places in different countries.

Andre B. Reynolds is a leisure writer who enjoys sharing information about attorney blog and slip liability as well as other interesting topics.

View the original article here

The Benefits Of A Criminal Defense Lawyer

Do you need to find a criminal defense lawyer? If you're facing a criminal charge, finding a reputable attorney will certainly be beneficial for your case.

It might be all you need is a consultation. You don't actually need their services in a court situation; you just need legal help and guidance. But for a major charge, it's crucial you hire a competent criminal defense lawyer. As far as what an attorney will cost you, it all depends upon your case. Is it complex or simple? Is the charge severe or minor? All of these situations will determine how much the retainer will cost. The kind of witnesses he or she will use in your defense can also affect the amount you'll be charged.

There are four basic ways to find an attorney. Any or all of them will prove to be useful.

1. Referrals. Ask your friends, family members, coworkers, or neighbors if they have ever used one or can make a possible suggestion.

2. Courtroom experience. Attend criminal cases and observe how certain attorneys perform. You may find one who's courtroom tactics appeal to you.

3. Check professional organizations. Contact bar associations for a referral.

4. Directories. Check online through legal directories or at your public library.

Once you've selected one or two attorneys, contact each one for a case consultation. Many will extend these to possible clients free of charge. It might be beneficial to call each attorney previous to the appointment and ask him or her simple questions such as their general experience defending criminals and any other specifics that relate to a case like yours.

After your initial phone conversation and face-to-face appointment, it's time to trust your instincts. Do you like the attorney? Is there compatibility between the two of you? Remember, you're just at the consulting stage. You don't need to feel obligated to hire them if there isn't a good rapport. Make sure you read over the full agreement before you sign anything. Get a copy for your records too.

If you don't want to go through all the trouble of finding a criminal defense lawyer yourself, consider the fact you may be eligible for a court-appointed attorney. The only disadvantage is that you'll have no control over who you are assigned. But this isn't always the case as many court-appointed attorneys take their cases quite seriously and do an excellent job for their clients. A public defender will often have more experience than a private attorney would have in these particular cases.

Be careful of anyone who makes you promises in advance before hearing your case completely. If they promise you won't go to jail or they tell you your case is very easy, beware. Many unscrupulous attorneys will diminish the seriousness of your crime in order to get you to agree to sign a retainer. Once they've done that, they've got you and your case could become a disaster.

Are you in a bind where hiring a Knoxville TN Criminal Defense Lawyer may be necessary? If you're looking for legal defense you can rely upon contact the offices of http://www.knox-law.com/ for a consultation.

View the original article here

Corporate Legal Law

One of the most frequently chosen methods for operating today's business is through the creation and maintenance of a corporation. As corporations are present in most communities and provinces, it is therefore necessary to have a working understanding of corporate law. Some of the key elements of corporate law will therefore be reviewed below.

Sole proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations

While it is possible to start and maintain a business without a corporation, such as through a partnership or even a sole proprietorship, such business configurations offer a number of disadvantages in comparison to forming a corporate entity.

The primary disadvantages lie in the enormous amount of personal responsibility owners face when it comes to details such as liabilities and obligations and debts related to the business.

In comparison, the single salient feature of a corporation is limited liability for managers and owners. This is because corporations are legally considered to be people.

Corporate components

The primary elements of a corporation involve the shareholders, who are recognized as the legal owners of the corporation, although each shareholder typically only owns a small portion of the corporation.

There are also the officers and directors who are responsible for the management and supervision of the corporation. In several cases there are also non-executive employees who serve the corporation in one way or another.

Because corporations have similar rights and obligations to humans without the liabilities of human beings, shareholders are responsible for choosing corporate directors who are directed to perform duties on behalf of the corporation.

Benefits of incorporation

As noted above, the primary benefit in terms of corporate law related to incorporating a business involve the limited liability and distinct legal personality of the corporation.

To put things another way, shareholders of a corporation can enjoy limited amounts of liability in regard to the liabilities, debts, and obligations of the corporation to the amount they initially invested for purchasing corporate shares.

In contrast, partners and sole proprietors of small businesses may potentially lose their own personal assets in addition to the business assets they directly invested into their business.

Second, employees, directors, and owners of a business that has been incorporated may be legally distinguished from each other. In contrast, a sole proprietor faces all of the responsibilities of the business he or she creates, as the proprietor is by definition both owner and manager of said business, and cannot be thought of as an employee of the business.

Third, corporations can entice employees and managers as well as motivate them since they can opt in to purchasing shares of the business, which is not possible with sole proprietorships and partnerships.

Fourth, corporate tax rates are typically lower than the rates faced by individuals, which essentially means that corporations can earn money more quickly than individuals and personal businesses and hold on to much more of that money, which means more profits for individual shareholders.

Finally, corporations also have the power to merge or become subsumed within larger corporations, adding to their lucrative potential.

Cote Law Professional Corporation 1183 King Street West #200 Toronto, ON M6K 3C5 Canada +1 416-913-7288 offers a wide range of expert legal services, from corporate and business law to family and support law. For more information on the services provided or to learn more about Cote Law Firm click here

View the original article here

Do Yourself a Favor and Hire a Real Estate Lawyer

If you are in the process of finalizing a real estate transaction, you may want to hire a real estate lawyer. It can be challenging trying to make heads or tails out of what any documents say. This is why you need a professional that can assist you with your transactions. They can give you guidance that will protect your interests. Keep in mind that the process of buying and selling can legally binding so you need someone on your side that has a vested interest in your cause. In order to prevent you from becoming the victim of malpractice, you need to hire a real estate lawyer.

You may think that you can hire any type of attorney if you have disputes and other issues that require you to have legal representation. Since the laws regarding real estate are so diverse and complex, you don't want to rely on the expertise of a general attorney. You need a real estate lawyer who is knowledgeable about the laws regarding your transactions and well versed in handling cases that are similar in nature to yours. You never know when you are going to need their help getting a hold of certain documents. Laws change often and you need someone who is abreast each and every change so you will know how it may affect you. You don't want to be someone who is trying to complete a transaction using outdated information. Your real estate lawyer can help to reduce your risk and help you protect your financial investment.

It doesn't matter what your role is. Whether you are going to be the buyer or the seller, you are going to need documents to help put together any propositions, deals, contracts and other documents that may be required for you to gain possession of the title.

You need someone who is skilled at looking over all the documents regarding the sale and purchase of any purchase. The person you hire to review all of the paperwork needs to be someone that represents your interests. Even if you have been working with a real estate agent, but your agent cannot legally give you legal guidance. You still need a professional whose job is to look over property transaction documents and make sure that you understand everything that is in question and to make sure that the paperwork has acceptable terms for you.

If you find yourself in doubt as to whether or not a transaction is being done in accordance with the law, you can always go to your attorney for guidance. They are there to make sure you don't enter into any illegal or unattractive legal contracts. If there is something in any contracts you don't agree too, they can provide you with revisions to help make the document more attractive for you. Before you complete any real estate transaction, hire a real estate lawyer to do a complete inspection of all legal documents.

Buying new property? Stay protected and learn more about Houston TX Real Estate Lawyer at: http://www.welscherlawfirm.net/.

View the original article here

Signs You Need A Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Attorney

Do you need a Chapter 7 bankruptcy attorney? If you are planning to file, you should hire one to help you through the process. Doing so can reduce the risks you face of making a mistake that leads to a dismissal of your case. Is this process the right decision for you? If you are unsure if you should file, a lawyer can help with that decision as well. Since this is a decision with long-lasting results, it is not one to make lightly or without the right professionals by your side through it.

You Are Falling Behind on Your Home

One of the reasons to call a Chapter 7 bankruptcy attorney is to get your home's mortgage back on track. Often, individuals find themselves struggling to get bills paid. They have to decide what to pay first. If you are trying to keep up on credit cards and, as a result, you are falling behind on your mortgage, now is the time to get help financially. If you are missing utility payments because creditors are hounding you for payment, contact an attorney to help you.

You Are Out of Work

If you have lost your job and have no ability to make your payments, it may be time to look for a more permanent debt solution. This is especially true in situations where you simply cannot get a job fast enough to stay up to date. On the other hand, it can be important in situations where you may find it impossible to get caught up with your current income. Losing a job can put people in a position where they cannot get caught back up on payments.

Creditors Are Calling All the Time

For some people, you spend more time dealing with creditors than you do working. If they are calling you at work or at home consistently, you may be so annoyed with the process that you want to take additional steps to fix the underlying problem. Sometimes, you simply want to get answers to your questions about how to file and just get it over with. That is the perfect time to call a lawyer to discuss the situation.

You've Failed Credit Counseling More Than Once

Sometimes, you simply cannot do anything but file it seems. For many, using credit counseling helps. For others, it does not. If you do not have the funds to make financial improvements, filing makes the most sense.

Discuss your case with a Chapter 7 bankruptcy attorney. Determine what your options are. Find out if there are other solutions to help you to avoid going bankrupt or find out what to do to file now. You may find that this decision is the first step in creating a strong financial future for yourself.

If you're contemplating filing then finding the right chapter 7 bankruptcy attorney modesto is important. Give yourself a better chance at a new leaf by contacting http://www.bankruptcycenterhelp.com/.

View the original article here

Is the IRS After You for Back Taxes?

One thing to understand is that while you might want to avoid the situation entirely, this is precisely the wrong thing to do! The last thing anyone wants is to have their property or money garnished because they didn't know how to handle things. The best thing to do in a case like this is to get an expert in who can make sense of your situation and calmly create a plan that gets the IRS off your back and that you can live with while not decreasing your quality of life. The thing to realize is that so long as you make an effort to fix the problem, and keep your obligations up, you won't have issues with loss of property or other consequences. Options that you can use are installment plans, paying the balance in full, as well as making an offer to try and reduce your total amount owing.

Just what is the statute of limitations on back taxes? The IRS has ten years to collect from you. After ten years, the debt is wiped out. That's not to say it's wise to try to ride out back taxes. IRS collection efforts begin at the site where you filed your tax return and continue to their Automated Collection System. If the ACS doesn't get anywhere and you owe more than $25,000, that's when your case ends up with a revenue officer- who may make a surprise visit to your home or office. The IRS may send one or more levy notices to your financial institution(s) or any employer or contractor known to have paid you. Getting help with your back taxes and trying to resolve them is a much better option!

A tax attorney or professional will help determine if you really owe all the back taxes the IRS says you owe. The IRS commonly makes mistakes- don't pay them more than you need to. You are entitled to a full explanation of how they arrived at the number they did. A tax professional can uncover missed deductions and ensure that you've been credited for all payments, including wage or bank levies and any refunds taken. These oversights can amend your back taxes and reduce your bill.

Offers in Compromise- Negotiating Tax Bills for Much Less Than The Original Amount

It is possible- and offers tremendous peace of mind- to wipe your back taxes slate clean for a fraction of what you owe. This is where a tax attorney or professional comes into play. They will advise you on exactly how to initiate this process, as well as improving your chances of qualifying. It is entirely up to the IRS's discretion to accept an Offer in Compromise (OIC) from you. Once you have submitted an OIC, the IRS must give it fair consideration. Statistics show that the IRS is more willing than ever to make deals with taxpayers. One in two Offers in Compromise are accepted by the IRS.

Help with back taxes is only a mouse click or phone call away. It's commonplace for people to owe more than they can reasonably afford, so don't sweat it. Viable options include extensions, payment installments, tax reductions or suspension of collection due to financial hardship. A professional will guide you in the right direction with any back tax situation you may have. Contact a tax attorney for assistance and advice.

Call: 203.269.6699
Email: info@irsmedic.com
Skype: irs.medic
Want to learn more about how to solve IRS problems once and for all? Check out "7 Steps to Sanity"
back tax help

View the original article here